© Copyright SASI Group (University of Sheffield) and Mark Newman (University of Michigan).

Here appear occasional jottings of my random musings. Profound or jejune, they reveal the contours of my mental universe, with world history, intellectual history, civilizations, philosophy, religion, society, knowledge, and books as some major themes. Since May 2011, this blog has been exclusively focused on Singapore. All my other reflections are now posted in "Notes from Noosphere" (see link under "Miscellany" on the right margin).
Showing posts with label global perspective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global perspective. Show all posts
Saturday, October 30, 2010
World Poverty with Worldmapper
In 2002, an estimated 17% of the world population (1073 million) lived on US$1 a day, or less (source). An estimated 43% of the world population (2698 million) lived on US$2 a day, or less (source).
Friday, October 29, 2010
Bibliosphere, viewed with Worldmapper
Worldmapper is a wonderful way of gaining a visual perspective on many aspects, social (demography, health, education, etc), economic, cultural, of the globe.
Maps 343, 344 (below) show the total book titles published, and the total book loans from public libraries, respectively, in 1999. Map 2 shows populations, and serves as the reference for other maps.
Titles Published
Book Loans
Populations
Map © Copyright SASI Group (University of Sheffield) and Mark Newman (University of Michigan)
Map source
Maps 343, 344 (below) show the total book titles published, and the total book loans from public libraries, respectively, in 1999. Map 2 shows populations, and serves as the reference for other maps.



Map source
Labels:
book statistics,
global perspective,
worldmapper
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Southeast Asia and Singapore: Crossroads of world civilizations
It is remarkable, but unremarked upon(in my experience), that Southeast Asia is at the crossroads of the four major civilizations of the world: Christian, Islamic, Indic and Sinic.
The four civilizations exercice their dominent influence in the following countries:
1. Christian (Roman Catholic): The Philippines (except Mindanao), East Timor
2. Islamic: Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Mindanao (Philippines)
3. Indic
a. Theravada Buddhism: Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia.
b. Hinduism: Bali (Indonesia)
4. Sinic: Vietnam, Singapore
Singapore, uniquely in Southeast Asia, shows the strong presence of all four civilizations.
The four civilizations exercice their dominent influence in the following countries:
1. Christian (Roman Catholic): The Philippines (except Mindanao), East Timor
2. Islamic: Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Mindanao (Philippines)
3. Indic
a. Theravada Buddhism: Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia.
b. Hinduism: Bali (Indonesia)
4. Sinic: Vietnam, Singapore
Singapore, uniquely in Southeast Asia, shows the strong presence of all four civilizations.
Labels:
civilizations,
cultures,
global perspective,
Singapore,
Southeast Asia
Cultural realms, civilizations
I have found the following conceptual framework of world civilizations by Jan Broek ("A Geography of Mankind" (1968,1973,1978), Jan O.M. Broek and John W. Webb) very useful.
A. Major civilizations:
1. Occidental (Christian)
2, Main Islamic (excluding SE Asia)
3. Indic (Hindu)
4. Sinic (East Asian)
B. Minor civilizations:
5. Southeast Asian
6. Meso-African (Negro-African, sub-Saharan African)
7. Southern Pacific (Melanesian-Polynesian)
"The Clash of Civilizations" by Samuel P. Huntington provides a more contemporary, more geo-political, framework, shown in the following map (map source: Wikipedia):
Broek's conceptual framework accommodates Huntington's nine civilizations, thus:
A, 4 Major Civilizations:
1. Christian
a. Western
b. Latin American
c. Orthodox
2. Islamic
3. Indic
a. Hindu
b. Buddhist
4. Sinic
a. Chinese-Korean-Vietnamese
b. Japanese
B. Minor Civilization:
5. Meso-African
A similar view of the major civilizations can be gained by examining the spread of the major religions.
(source)
Labels:
civilizations,
cultures,
global perspective
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Cultural comparison in five dimensions (Geert Hofstede)
I have just come across Geert Hofstede's fascinating five-dimensional quantitative model of culture. Data have been collected for 66 cultures across the globe, including those of US, UK, China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Ranked by Individualism, one of the five dimensions, US, Australia and UK are the top nations. Ranked by Uncertainty Avoidance, Singapore is the nation most ready for uncertainty. Surprisingly, Malaysian culture is the most willing to accept the existence of a power elite. (For analysis of the Hofstede scores of individual societies, see this.)
Reducing a culture to five numbers is inherently unsatisfactory and subjective. However, such an exercise provides a global perspective that complements the in-depth understanding of an individual culture which each person can only hope to attain for a few cultures in his/her lifetime.
The World Values Survey is a similar project that produces the interesting Inglehart–Welzel Map (map source: Wikipedia), where the vertical axis correlates strongly with Atheism, and the horizontal axis correlates strongly with Wealth. These two dimensions arose out of a factor analysis of ten variables, and account for more than 70% of the variance.
Reducing a culture to five numbers is inherently unsatisfactory and subjective. However, such an exercise provides a global perspective that complements the in-depth understanding of an individual culture which each person can only hope to attain for a few cultures in his/her lifetime.
The World Values Survey is a similar project that produces the interesting Inglehart–Welzel Map (map source: Wikipedia), where the vertical axis correlates strongly with Atheism, and the horizontal axis correlates strongly with Wealth. These two dimensions arose out of a factor analysis of ten variables, and account for more than 70% of the variance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)